Testing random

[Mark Lawrence]

On 17/06/2015 02:01, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:36 AM,  <sohcahtoa82 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes, we all know what the gambler's fallacy is, but that's not what anyone is arguing.
>
> The only instance of gambler's fallacy I'm seeing here is "PointedEars
> didn't understand the last dozen emails, so he's due to understand the
> next one". I've given up trying to explain.
>
> ChrisA
>

An alternative explanation is that he's just a plain, old fashioned 
troll, as pointed out by Denis McMahon some weeks ago.  Now what is the 
probability of that? :)

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence