Did the 3.4.4 docs get published early?

[Nicholas Chammas]

Sorry, somehow the formatting in my previous email didn't come through
correctly.

This part was supposed to be in a quote block:

> Also, just replacing the version number in the URL works for the python 3
series
> (use 3.X even for python 3.0), even farther back than the drop down menu
allows.

Nick

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:25 PM Nicholas Chammas <nicholas.chammas at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Also, just replacing the version number in the URL works for the python 3
> series (use 3.X even for python 3.0), even farther back than the drop down
> menu allows.
>
> This does not help in this case:
>
> https://docs.python.org/3.4/library/asyncio-task.html#asyncio.ensure_future
>
> Also, you cannot select the docs for a maintenance release, like 3.4.3.
>
> Anyway, it’s not a big deal as long as significant changes are tagged
> appropriately with notes like “New in version NNN”, which they are.
>
> Ideally, the docs would only show the latest changes for released versions
> of Python, but since some changes (like the one I linked to) are introduced
> in maintenance versions, it’s probably hard to separate them out into
> separate branches.
>
> Nick
> ​
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:11 AM Nicholas Chammas <
> nicholas.chammas at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> For example, here is a "New in version 3.4.4" method:
>>
>> https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html#asyncio.ensure_future
>>
>> However, the latest release appears to be 3.4.3:
>>
>> https://www.python.org/downloads/
>>
>> Is this normal, or did the 3.4.4 docs somehow get published early by
>> mistake?
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20150610/a4bcbfe2/attachment.html>