Decimals and other numbers

Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierreda at gmail.com
Thu Jan 8 22:13:32 EST 2015


Thanks Ben, with your encouragement I have filed
http://bugs.python.org/issue23201

-- Devin

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Ben Finney <ben+python at benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> Dave Angel <davea at davea.name> writes:
>
>> What you don't say is which behavior you actually expected.  Since
>> 0**0 is undefined mathematically, I'd expect either an exception or a
>> NAN result.
>
> Do you think that the ‘int’ and ‘float’ types, which do produce a number
> result for ‘0 ** 0’, are buggy and should be fixed?
>
> I think the inconsistency is unnecessarily confusing. Perhaps the
> consistency is in standards outside Python, but I think there is cause
> here either for a change of behaviour or, if ther eis a good rationale
> for the incompatible behaviours, to document the rationale. In either
> case, a bug report is warranted IMO.
>
> --
>  \     “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that |
>   `\      divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of |
> _o__)            being correct.” —Niels Bohr (to Wolfgang Pauli), 1958 |
> Ben Finney
>
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list



More information about the Python-list mailing list