sqlite3 and dates

Chris Angelico rosuav at gmail.com
Wed Feb 18 17:37:49 EST 2015


On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:17 AM,  <rurpy at yahoo.com.dmarc.invalid> wrote:
>> SQLite3 is fine for something that's basically just a more structured
>> version of a flat file. You assume that nobody but you has the file
>> open, and you manipulate it just the same as if it were a big fat blob
>> of JSON, but thanks to SQLite, you don't have to rewrite the whole
>> file every time you make a small change. That's fine.
>
> That's bullshit.  Sqlite offers a lot more than that including
> a SQL interface, transactions, referential integrity, constraints
> indexes, triggers and other general relational database features.
>
> That you would equate that to a JSON blob would indicate either
> a profound ignorance about Sqlite or (more likely) a need to
> defend your preference with complete disregard of fact.

I didn't equate them. I said that SQLite3 is great if you look on it
as an upgrade over a JSON blob. Of course it offers more features than
that, and you don't need to swear at me to make your point.

But SQLite3 is *not* great if you look on it as a database engine
comparable with DB2, PostgreSQL, and even MySQL.

ChrisA



More information about the Python-list mailing list