Python 3 is killing Python

[wxjmfauth at gmail.com]

Le mercredi 28 mai 2014 22:24:15 UTC+2, Mark Lawrence a écrit :
> On 28/05/2014 20:58, Larry Martell wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Paul Rubin <no.email at nospam.invalid
> 
> > <mailto:no.email at nospam.invalid>> wrote:
> 
> >
> 
> >     Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com
> 
> >     <mailto:larry.martell at gmail.com>> writes:
> 
> >      > Somthing I came across in my travels through the ether:
> 
> >      > [1]https://medium.com/@deliciousrobots/5d2ad703365d/
> 
> >
> 
> >     "Python 3 can revive Python" https://medium.com/p/2a7af4788b10
> 
> >        long HN comment thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7801834
> 
> >
> 
> >     "Python 3 is fine" http://sealedabstract.com/rants/python-3-is-fine/
> 
> >
> 
> >     OT: wow that medium site is obnoxious.
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > No company that I work for is using python 3 - they just have too much
> 
> > of an investment in a python 2 code base to switch. I'm just saying.
> 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> So you're happy because you've support until at least 2020, and the 
> 
> people using Python 3 are happy, mainly because of the vastly improved 
> 
> unicode handling via the FSR and asyncio in 3.4.  Presumably the only 
> 
> unhappy people are those who keep bleating on about forking Python to 
> 
> produce a 2.8, or has work on this already started without my knowledge?
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask 
> 
> what you can do for our language.
> 
> 
> 
> Mark Lawrence
> 
===========

Unicode: a reason to not use Python.

jmf