xmlrpc: problems with socket handling, close, shutdown of server, TIME_WAIT, ...
dieter
dieter at handshake.de
Wed May 7 02:43:16 EDT 2014
thomas.lehmann.private at googlemail.com writes:
> ...
> taking the xml-rpc derived from standard example is working - basically - but with following scenario I do not understand the problem. Maybe you can help:
>
> - one Unittest that does create the xmlrpc server in a thread
> in "setUp" and shutdown of it in tearDown.
> The xml-rcp server does store/load a value for a key.
> (It's for testing/learning purpose)
>
> Problem(s):
>
> - If I run the test method twice (copy and paste and rename)
> then I get a "error: [Errno 98] Address already in use"
> (I assumend the tearDown would have closed all sockets)
For reliability reasons (their might be (communication) packets under way
that may arrive at the wrong partner), a port stays "in use"
for twice (I think) the maximal packet lifetime after its "shutdown".
This is a TCP (not a Python) property.
There is a TCP(socket) option to supress this.
For the details, consult the TCP specification.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list