[Python-Dev] Python 2.x and 3.x use survey, 2014 edition

[wxjmfauth at gmail.com]

Le jeudi 11 décembre 2014 23:22:49 UTC+1, Barry Warsaw a écrit :
> On Dec 11, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> 
> >I disagree. I know there's a huge focus on The Big Libraries (and wholesale
> >migration is all but impossible without them), but the long tail of
> >libraries is still incredibly important.
> 
> It is, but I think it's increasingly the case that packages which don't
> support Python 3 will either be shamed into it, important enough to get high
> quality contributed ports, or will be effectively abandoned and alternatives
> found.  This is a big change from where we were several years ago.
> 
> All my new $work code is Python 3.  Some libraries are bilingual but
> applications start and stay in Python 3-only.
> 
> Just recently the last two dependencies in Mailman 3 that blocked us from
> beginning the port to Python 3 have been replaced[1].  We have active branches
> that are slowly porting own code now[2].
> 
> While we can't quite declare victory yet, and there will always be legacy code
> for which there just aren't the resources to port, I think it's perfectly
> reasonable for Python 3 to be the default target version for any new code (and
> a lot of existing code).
> 
> Cheers,
> -Barry
> 
> [1] SQLAlchemy replaced Storm, and Falcon replaced restish in our trunk.
> 
> [2] https://code.launchpad.net/~barry/mailman/py3 and
> https://code.launchpad.net/~raj-abhilash1/mailman/py3

I will be able to make Python 3.5 failing or crashing
with any valid string I wish, as I able to do now.

jmf