Cookie fr*cking problem

[Neil Cerutti]

On 2013-10-29, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:20:17 +0000, Neil Cerutti wrote:
>
>> On 2013-10-27, Ben Finney <ben+python at benfinney.id.au> wrote:
>>> I have no particular objection to you responding to those
>>> instances of bad behaviour that I've omitted.
>> 
>> So you omitted them, eh?
>> 
>> You just omitted the body of the letter, that's all! You've
>> left out the body of the letter, that's all. Yours is not to
>> reason why, Jamison. You've left out the body of the letter!
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>> Fine. Send it that way, and tell them the body will follow.
>
> Was that the letter made out to the solicitors Hummerdinger,
> Hummerdinger, Hummerdinger, Hummerdinger, and McCormack? As I
> recall, not only did the secretary leave out one of the
> Hummerdingers, but he left out the most important one.

Yep, from, "Animal Crackers." Although I believe it's,
"Hunger-Dunger." You were close though. You were close though,
and I bet you still are. ;)

-- 
Neil Cerutti