What's the difference between these two uses of "for"?

[alex23]

On Mar 18, 12:33 pm, Roy Smith <r... at panix.com> wrote:
> Google's motto may be "don't be evil", but they get to define what evil
> is.  Apparently working and playing well with mailing list technology
> which has worked just fine for literally decades isn't part of the
> definition.

Their decision to scrap Reader while ploughing forward with this
godawful new UI for Groups has pushed them into the "evil" basket for
me :(