Decorators not worth the effort

[Jean-Michel Pichavant]

----- Original Message -----
> Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel at sequans.com> writes:
> 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> One minor note, the style of decorator you are using loses the
> >> docstring
> >> (at least) of the original function. I would add the
> >> @functools.wraps(func)
> >> decorator inside your decorator.
> >
> > Is there a way to not loose the function signature as well ?
> 
> Look at the "decorator" module.
> 

Great, thank you.

JM