Decorators not worth the effort

[Dieter Maurer]

Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel at sequans.com> writes:

> ----- Original Message -----
>> Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
> [snip]
>> One minor note, the style of decorator you are using loses the
>> docstring
>> (at least) of the original function. I would add the
>> @functools.wraps(func)
>> decorator inside your decorator.
>
> Is there a way to not loose the function signature as well ?

Look at the "decorator" module.