Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?

[MRAB]

Russ P. wrote:
> On Jan 20, 10:02 pm, alex23 <wuwe... at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Can I comprehend that you don't even have an immediate need and are
>> instead actively engaging in online onanism? Absolutely.
> 
> So anyone thinking beyond an "immediate need" is "engaging in online
> onanism"?
> 
That doesn't mean what you think it means.

> Let's see. How long ago did the Python community start thinking about
> Python 3?
> 
> So I guess they're all a bunch of jerkoffs, eh?
>