Python and Flaming Thunder

[I V]

On Thu, 22 May 2008 19:35:50 -0700, Charles Hixson wrote:
> Although when comparing Candygram with Erlang it's worth noting that
> Candygram is bound to one processor, where Erlang can operate on
> multiple processors. (I'd been planning on using Candygram for a project
> at one point, but this made it unusable.)

Really? The FAQ says it uses operating system threads, which I would have 
thought would mean it runs on multiple processors (modulo, I suppose, the 
issues with the GIL).