GUI toolkits with Tkinter's .pack() alternative
Guilherme Polo
ggpolo at gmail.com
Thu Mar 27 07:31:03 EDT 2008
2008/3/27, Alex9968 <noname9968 at gmail.com>:
> Guilherme Polo wrote:
> > 2008/3/27, Alex9968 <noname9968 at gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Guilherme Polo wrote:
> >> > 2008/3/26, Alex9968 <noname9968 at gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi all,
> >> >>
> >> >> I use Tkinter's Pack widget geometry manager (I really prefer it over
> >> >> using visual GUI designers), so my question is which other GUI toolkits
> >> >> have similar functionality.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > The geometry manager isn't related to using GUI designers tools at
> >> > all. And each toolkit has it's own way to do the things, wxPython uses
> >> > sizers, PyGtk uses containers.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Well, the geometry manager isn't *directly* related to using GUI
> >> designers, but as Pack arranges widgets automatically, using GUI
> >> designers isn't required, while with geometry managers that don't, GUI
> >> designers are necessary (if you start placing widgets programmatically,
> >> you'll end up reinventing something like Tkinter's Pack or Grid geometry
> >> manager). I hope I can be understood clearly this time ;-)
> >>
> >
> > Not at all, can't understand your point yet. GUI designers aren't just
> > for placing widgets, they also will keep the interface design
> > separated from your code.
> >
>
> I do not want to separate interface from code and I do not experience
> the need to use GUI designers.
>
It is your opinion, it seems I can't change it for now but I hope you
reconsider it for the future.
> Pack arranges widgets perfectly, and it's very complex to do the same
> without it, both in code and in GUI designer.
For some level of "perfect", of course.
Also, I can't understand why you say it is hard to do such thing in a
gui designer tool, which tool have you tried ? Maybe you are not
familiar with them yet, and that could be the problem.
> I wish toolkits I use to
> be able to place widgets one after another automatically.
>
They all make this possible, you could try doing something on another
toolkit you are interested and check if it does what you want.
> >
> >>>> Secondly, I like the detailed widget borders configuration possible in
> >>>>
> >> >> Tkinter, which can be used to tweak GUI look, and wonder if other
> >> >> toolkits support it. With Tkinter's case, I like the resulting (tweaked)
> >> >> look in Windows, but I'm afraid it can be quite different (and ugly) on
> >> >> other platforms.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > You sure can, but differently.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I suppose any toolkit allows setting parameters like "no border", "flat
> >> border" and "3d border", but which ones can set ANY type of border to
> >> ANY widget like Tkinter does? For example set GROOVE border to buttons
> >> and text widgets (instead of traditional wide raised/lowered borders),
> >> which is cool (in my opinion).
> >>
> >>
> >
> > The widgets subclass some base class, which contains some common
> > methods which could be the border and relief for example.
> > In the case of PyGtk, border
> > width is controlled at Container, so most widgets will have this
> > feature, but the relief style of the widget is not common to all
> > widgets so you will need to check this one (Button has it).
> > In wxPython, widgets will subclass Window, which has all you want and more.
> > But PyQt doesn't seem to care much about this, you can change the
> > widget to flat (if it makes sense to that widget have setFlat method)
> > but not much related to the borders.
> > You could recheck your use-cases and see if they are acceptable.
> >
> >
> >> >> (The reason I ever consider moving from Tkinter is some inconveniences,
> >> >> involving for example window scrolling, plus its smaller amount of
> >> >> widgets compared to some other toolkits, plus its (rumored) ugly look on
> >> >> certain environments. I will not necessary change the toolkit, but I
> >> >> have to consider it)
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > I'm planning to "solve" this, I'm suggesting inclusion of Ttk into
> >> > Tkinter for upcoming GSoC. For now you could try using Tile extension,
> >> > and update to Tk 8.5. If you don't want to use extensions, then you
> >> > will have to wait or change the toolkit for now.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Thanks. I haven't heard of Tile before, now I will keep this in mind.
> >> You forgot to mention WHAT you're planning to solve ;-) , so I have to
> >> add that Tile is modernization of Tk widgets (so it fixes ugly look).
> >>
> >>
> >
> > WHAT I'm planning to solve, quote from my own paragraph:
> > "I'm planning to "solve" this, I'm suggesting inclusion of Ttk into
> > Tkinter for upcoming GSoC."
> >
> > I would like to add the possibility to use Ttk widgets into tkinter,
> > providing you have Tk 8.5. It would solve the problem of "not enough
> > widgets" and the other one of "being ugly" mainly. Tk 8.5 also
> > auto-fixes some other problems, it provides smooth-scrolling for the
> > text widget, for example. But keep in mind that using Tk 8.5 in Python
> > is not yet supported (but possible).
> >
>
> I understood you. I added that sentence just to make it clear for anyone
> reading this. Your participation is appreciated greatly, thank you.
>
--
-- Guilherme H. Polo Goncalves
More information about the Python-list
mailing list