Why prefer != over <> for Python 3.0?

Bjoern Schliessmann usenet-mail-0306.20.chr0n0ss at spamgourmet.com
Sun Mar 30 08:48:26 EDT 2008


Torsten Bronger wrote:

> Maybe he means "?".

Haven't seen this either, nor do I think it's the same than "<>".
>From afar, it looks more like "><". But this does more look like
South Park style shut eyes than an operator. :)
 
Regards,


Björn

-- 
BOFH excuse #407:

Route flapping at the NAP.




More information about the Python-list mailing list