sudoku solver in Python ...
Boris Borcic
bborcic at gmail.com
Fri Jan 25 06:25:03 EST 2008
>> http://norvig.com/sudoku.html
(...)
> Below is the "winner" of my hacking for an as fast as
> possible 110% pure python (no imports at all!) comprehensive sudoku
> solver under 50 LOCs, back in 2006. Performance is comparable to the
> solver you advertize - numbers are slightly better, but platform
> differences could easily absorb that -
More precise comparisons, after noting that on Norvig's pages there were
contradictory performance numbers (obviously some 0 inserted or deleted).
Running on my machine on the "top95" list of hard problems given on Norvig's
page, my code takes about 7.5 ms/problem while Norvig's takes 42 ms/problem.
So that's a 82% reduction of running time.
Psyco.full() reduces the running time of my code to just about 4 ms/problem
while it grows Norvig's to 47 ms/problem.
BB
> eg (not counting module
> initialization and not using psyco) it takes 9.3 ms average on the "AI
> escargot" problem linked to in Norvig's page, 5.6 ms/problem on some
> standard "top1465" list of hard problems, and 3.4 ms/problem on the
> first 1000 on some other "top50000" list of relatively hard problems.
> This on my 2GHz Intel Centrino '05 laptop. Psyco reduces times by about
> 50%. Dropping performance requirements by half allows reducing LOC count
> in proportion.
>
> OTOH, the code although short is nearly unreadable, sorry; should
> probably feature/comment it on some web page, like the two already
> proposed in the thread. Will do if/for reviewer. Interface is calling
> sudoku99(problem) with 'problem' a standard 81 character string with '0'
> or '.' placeholder for unknowns. Returns same with values filled in.
>
> Beware that although in practice it solved all well-formed
> human-solvable problems I could find, it is not guaranteed to deal
> properly (or even terminate?) for underdetermined problems or determined
> problems that would require exploring choicepoints with more than 2
> possibilities (if such exist).
>
> Cheers, Boris
>
>
>
> w2q = [[n/9,n/81*9+n%9+243,n%81+162,n%9*9+n/243*3+n/27%3+81]
> for n in range(729)]
> q2w = (z[1] for z in sorted((x,y) for y,s in enumerate(w2q) for x in s))
> q2w = map(set,zip(*9*[q2w]))
> w2q2w = [set(w for q in qL for w in q2w[q] if w!=w0) for w0,qL in
> enumerate(w2q)]
> empty = set(range(729)).copy
>
> def sudoku99(problem) :
> givens = set(9*j+int(k)-1 for j,k in enumerate(problem) if '0'<k)
> ws=search(givens,[9]*len(q2w),empty())
> return ''.join(str(w%9+1) for w in sorted(ws))
>
> def search(w0s,q2nw,free) :
> while 1 :
> while w0s:
> w0 = w0s.pop()
> for q in w2q[w0] : q2nw[q]=100
> wz = w2q2w[w0]&free
> free-=wz
> for w in wz :
> for q in w2q[w] :
> n = q2nw[q] = q2nw[q]-1
> if n<2 :
> ww,=q2w[q]&free
> w0s.add(ww)
> if len(free)==81 : return free
> thres = int((len(free)+52.85)/27.5)
> ix,vmax = -1,0
> try :
> while 1 :
> ix=q2nw.index(2,ix+1)
> for w0 in (q2w[ix]&free)-w0s :
> v = len(w2q2w[w0]&free)
> if v > vmax :
> ixmax = ix
> if v >=thres : break
> vmax = v
> w0s.add(w0)
> else : continue
> break
> except : pass
> w0,w1 = q2w[ixmax]&free
> try :
> w0s.clear()
> w0s.add(w0)
> return search(w0s,q2nw[:],free.copy())
> except ValueError :
> w0s.clear()
> w0s.add(w1)
>
More information about the Python-list
mailing list