Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

[Istvan Albert]

IMO this is not as much a framework comparison rather than an
evaluation of the individual components that make up Pylons.

The framework is the sum of all its parts. Programmers should not need
to know that that a package named Beaker is used for sessions, Routes
for url mapping, PasteDeploy for whatever. This is the weakness of all
glue-type frameworks i.e. TG and Pylons. It makes them look like they
are duct-taped together.

The more important question are whether the sessions actually work
properly: i.e does session data persist through a server restart?
Where is the session data stored: in memory, files, database and so
on.

The choice of templating language should be a non issue. Any half
decent framework should allow you to use any other templating engine
with ease.
... even python as you seem to prefer

i.