TeX pestilence (was Distributed RVS, Darcs, tech love)
George Neuner
gneuner2/ at /comcast.net
Mon Oct 22 11:30:51 EDT 2007
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:50:30 -0700, Xah Lee <xah at xahlee.org> wrote:
>TeX, in my opinion, has done massive damage to the computing world.
>
>i have written on this variously in emails. No coherent argument, but
>the basic thoughts are here:
>http://xahlee.org/cmaci/notation/TeX_pestilence.html
Knuth did a whole lot more for computing than you have or, probably,
ever will. Your arrogance is truly amazing.
>1. A typesetting system per se, not a mathematical expressions
>representation system.
So?
>2. The free nature, like cigeratte given to children, contaminated the
>entire field of math knowledge representation into 2 decades of
>stagnation.
What the frac are you talking about?
>3. Being a typesetting system, brainwashed entire generation of
>mathematicians into micro-spacing doodling.
Like they wouldn't be doodling anyway. At least the TeX doodling is
likely to be readable (as if anyone cared).
>4. Inargurated a massive collection of documents that are invalid
>HTML. (due to the programing moron's ingorance and need to idolize a
>leader, and TeX's inherent problem of being a typesetting system that
>is unsuitable of representing any structure or semantics)
HTML is unsuitable for representing most structure and semantics. And
legions of fumbling idiots compose brand new invalid HTML every day.
>5. This is arguable and trivial, but i think TeX judged as a computer
>language in particular its syntax, on esthetical grounds, sucks in
>major ways.
No one except you thinks TeX is a "computer language".
>Btw, a example of item 4 above, is Python's documentation. Fucking
>asses and holes.
Watch your language, there are children present.
George
--
for email reply remove "/" from address
More information about the Python-list
mailing list