omissions in python docs?

[memracom at yahoo.com]

> It often happened in the past that patches were admitted which don't
> simultaneously update the documentation, hence they diverge. These
> days, patches are regularly rejected for not providing proper
> documentation changes.

Nevertheless, the docs *ARE* old and poorly maintained. Sometimes you
find the info that you need in the docs, and other times Google is a
better source of information. I find that the weakest part of many
module docs are the examples.