BUSTED!!! 100% VIDEO EVIDENCE that WTC7 was controlled demolition!! NEW FOOTAGE!!! Ask yourself WHY havn't I seen this footage before?

[James Stroud]

quasi wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2007 17:00:01 -0400, krw <krw at att.bizzzz> wrote:
> 
> 
>>In article <j15v33h378a79fvqa3j03td6oaqabs8s2a at 4ax.com>, 
>>quasi at null.set says...
>>
>>>On Mon, 7 May 2007 10:55:55 -0400, James Beck
>>><jim at reallykillersystems.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article <0k8p33h90bp5tfajedb4bmd2eik8gfi2ho at 4ax.com>, quasi at null.set 
>>>>says...
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 05 May 2007 07:54:50 +0100, Eeyore
>>>>><rabbitsfriendsandrelations at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>quasi wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Gib Bogle wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Ah, so the firefighters were in on the conspiracy!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No, but the firefighters are very much aware that there is more to
>>>>>>>9/11 than has been officially revealed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>This is even more true at Pentagon. The firefighters there brought
>>>>>>>dogs trained to search for survivors and/or remains
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Sounds like good practice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>and found nothing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And the significance of this is ?
>>>>>
>>>>>The plane was supposed to have passengers.
>>>>>
>>>>>quasi
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Yep, and they found them all, therefore, there were none for the dogs to 
>>>>find.  
>>>
>>>You pretty much made that up.
>>>
>>>They found nothing -- no bodies, no body parts, no blood, no bones, no
>>>luggage, no rings (do gold rings melt at jet fuel temperatures?), no
>>>jewelry (do diamonds melt at jet fuel temperatures?), no plane seats,
>>>no silverware (ok, maybe they only had plastic). In other words, an
>>>immediate mystery to the firefighters was the lack of any indication
>>>that the plane had passengers. Even if you believe that most of the
>>>passengers were essentially incinerated, it's not believable that all
>>>of them were. Some of the bodies should have been recoverable right at
>>>the scene.
>>
>>If none of the passenger's remains were ever found, why all the fuss 
>>last year when they found more. 
> 
> 
> That's news to me. We're talking about the Pentagon, not the WTC.
> Besides, I didn't say that no remains were ever found. What I said was
> that no passenger remains were found at the Pentagon on 9/11 by the
> firefighters or their trained rescue dogs.
> 
> At the WTC, no passenger remains were ever found, as far as I know. Of
> course, that's not so surprising. What is surprising is the all too
> convenient find of Mohammed Atta's undamaged passport in the WTC
> rubble. It wasn't even buried. It was just sitting there, waiting to
> be found.
> 
> 
>>IOW, you're a liar.
> 
> 
> That's way too strong.
> 
> I'm not saying anything I know to be false.
> 
> 
>>>Weeks later, parts of the wreckage were supposedly "analyzed" at a
>>>government lab, and the official report claims they were able to
>>>isolate DNA for many of the passengers. It doesn't ring true. 
>>
>>...and a fool.
> 
> 
> See if you can keep your argument from degenerating to the level of
> personal attacks.
> 
> quasi

That is impossible for most people because this is an issue of religion 
for them. But then again, attacks are part of religion aren't they?