Trying to choose between python and java

[Aahz]

In article <f2d5ct$42k$1 at panix3.panix.com>, Aahz <aahz at pythoncraft.com> wrote:
>In article <f2bghg$4q0$1 at news-01.bur.connect.com.au>,
>Anthony Irwin  <nospam at noemailhere.nowhere> wrote:
>>
>>#5 someone said that they used to use python but stopped because the 
>>language changed or made stuff depreciated (I can fully remember 
>>which) and old code stopped working. Is code written today likely to 
>>still work in 5+ years or do they depreciate stuff and you have to update?
>
>You're probably thinking of
>http://www.gbch.net/gjb/blog/software/discuss/python-sucks.html
>
>Thing is, while he has a point, I don't think it's a very good one.  For
>example, just yesterday in upgrading from Java 1.4.2 to Java 5.0, I had
>to fix a bunch of instances of "package foo.bar.baz;" to "package baz;"
>because apparently the latter is now "correct".  Bugfixes happen, and
>sometimes they break working code.

Update: I was wrong about the package thing -- turned out that someone
had made a backup copy of our code inside the source tree, and so ant
merrily went along and gave nice "duplicate class" errors...
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"Look, it's your affair if you want to play with five people, but don't
go calling it doubles."  --John Cleese anticipates Usenet