2.3-2.5 what improved?

[Gabriel Genellina]

At Wednesday 17/1/2007 10:29, billie wrote:

> > Python 2.5 became quite fat. For bare CGI the Python load/init
> > time eats all improvements. Smaller scripts even loose lot of speed.
>What do you mean? Fat of libraries or fat itself?
>I tought that 2.5 was faster than precedent versions! :-\

It runs faster, but has a slower start time. For CGI, when you launch 
a new process with every request, this is bad.
(This is a general problem with CGI itself - perhaps one should 
consider other alternatives, like FastCGI, mod_python, WSGI...)


-- 
Gabriel Genellina
Softlab SRL 


	

	
		
__________________________________________________ 
Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí. 
Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, 
está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). 
¡Probalo ya! 
http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas