Pep 3105: the end of print?

[Neil Cerutti]

On 2007-02-23, I V <wrongbad at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:46:31 -0800, Beliavsky wrote:
>> I think the C and C++ committees also take backwards
>> compatibility seriously, in part because they know that
>> working programmers will ignore them if they break too much
>> old code.
>
> While that's true, C++ compiler vendors, for example, take
> backwards compatibility significantly less seriously, it seems
> to me. 

Compiler vendors usually take care of their customers with
compiler switches that enable backwards compatibility.

-- 
Neil Cerutti