Co-developers wanted: document markup language
Torsten Bronger
bronger at physik.rwth-aachen.de
Fri Aug 24 10:17:27 EDT 2007
Hallöchen!
David Boddie writes:
> On Fri Aug 24 11:04:33 CEST 2007, Torsten Bronger wrote:
>
>> Paul Rubin writes:
>>
>>> TeX/LateX have been around forever and are well established
>>> standards, as awful as they are. Why do we want ANOTHER markup
>>> language?
>>
>> Well, because they are awful. ;-) I don't see that there is a
>> bunch of already existing projects, in fact, I don't see anyone
>> challenging LaTeX at all. However, competition is a good thing,
>> and I think there are enough aspects about LaTeX that can be done
>> better so that this project is worth being done.
>
> There are alternatives to LaTeX if you are prepared to look for
> them. One of these is Lout:
>
> http://lout.sourceforge.net/
I know Lout but its syntax is not simple enough to me. Besides, it
does not enforce semantic markup.
Tschö,
Torsten.
--
Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus
Jabber ID: bronger at jabber.org
(See http://ime.webhop.org for ICQ, MSN, etc.)
More information about the Python-list
mailing list