a good programming text editor (not IDE)
James Stroud
jstroud at ucla.edu
Fri Jun 16 15:59:02 EDT 2006
Tim Chase wrote:
>> No need to argue. I started with vim, and finally switched to
>> emacs less than one year later.
>
>
> Both are very-much-so good editors. I made the opposite switch
> from emacs to vim in less than a year. Both are good^Wgreat
> editors, so one's decision to use one over the other is more a
> matter of working style. I don't grok LISP, and just never felt
> at home in emacs, despite all the power I could see that was
> there. I grok vim (and its similar power/extensibility), so I
> migrated to it. I have to laugh at the whole holy-war thing, as
> it's somewhat like arguing about a favorite color. "But blue is
> so better than green! The sky is blue!" "Nuh, uh! Green is far
> better than blue! Grass is green!" (okay, here in Texas, that
> doesn't always hold as true...maybe personality #2 should be
> arguing for brown instead).
>
> My best friend is an emacs user, and I'm a vimmer...it doesn't
> come between us. :)
>
> -tkc
Yes, heartwarming, but if you are thinking marriage...
--
James Stroud
UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
Box 951570
Los Angeles, CA 90095
http://www.jamesstroud.com/
More information about the Python-list
mailing list