merits of Lisp vs Python

Björn Lindström bkhl at stp.lingfil.uu.se
Sun Dec 10 10:35:49 EST 2006


"mystilleef" <mystilleef at gmail.com>:

> Better OO? You mean the one that doesn't support basic encapsulation
> and is retardedly cumbersome to use?

Encapsulation isn't so much a property of the language as of your data
types.

> There's a reason I said, I'd never use Lisp for OO not even when I'm
> high. Gimme Python, Eiffel or Smalltalk anyday, not the retarded
> add-on package bolted on CL.

Python also lacks encapsulation, in the sense you probably mean.

-- 
Björn Lindström <bkhl at stp.lingfil.uu.se>
Student of computational linguistics, Uppsala University, Sweden



More information about the Python-list mailing list