merits of Lisp vs Python
Björn Lindström
bkhl at stp.lingfil.uu.se
Sun Dec 10 10:35:49 EST 2006
"mystilleef" <mystilleef at gmail.com>:
> Better OO? You mean the one that doesn't support basic encapsulation
> and is retardedly cumbersome to use?
Encapsulation isn't so much a property of the language as of your data
types.
> There's a reason I said, I'd never use Lisp for OO not even when I'm
> high. Gimme Python, Eiffel or Smalltalk anyday, not the retarded
> add-on package bolted on CL.
Python also lacks encapsulation, in the sense you probably mean.
--
Björn Lindström <bkhl at stp.lingfil.uu.se>
Student of computational linguistics, Uppsala University, Sweden
More information about the Python-list
mailing list