OT: p-gal website

[John Bokma]

"ajaksu" <ajaksu at gmail.com> wrote:

> And to answer your question, I recommend to follow standards because
> that's how I call the mixed bag of Recommendations, some of which are
> also Specifications, allowing for the inclusion of both significant
> Standards and standards. I guess I must've been bitten by the buzzword
> bug, sorry it that offends you. But I'm not the only one (TM).

True, but if one follows a document, shouldn't one name it according to 
how it's named in the document itself? To me, the answer is yes. 
Especially if people start to claim that "ISO HTML" and HTML 4.01 are 
identical standards.

A lot of people call Python, Perl, etc. *just* scripting languages, not 
real programming languages (whatever that may be). Should we join their 
ranks or educate?

-- 
John                               MexIT: http://johnbokma.com/mexit/
                           personal page:       http://johnbokma.com/
        Experienced programmer available:     http://castleamber.com/
            Happy Customers: http://castleamber.com/testimonials.html