Alternatives to Stackless Python?

[Christian Tismer]

Peter Hansen wrote:

> simonwittber at gmail.com wrote:
> 
>>>I found LGT http://lgt.berlios.de/ but it didn't seem as if the
>>>NanoThreads module had the same capabilites as stackless.
>>
>>What specific capabilities of Stackless are you looking for, that are
>>missing from NanoThreads?
> 
> 
> While I can't speak for the OP, isn't it the case that the threadlets in 
> Stackless (sorry, don't know what they are really called) are true 
> threads in the sense of being able to switch contexts no matter how far 
> down in a set of nested calls they might be?  And that NanoThreads are 
> simply generators, which means you can switch contexts only at the top 
> level, with a yield statement?
> 
> I don't know what the OP wants, but I could imagine that would be a 
> pretty fundamental difference (if I'm right about Stackless).

You are.

-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer at stackless.com>
tismerysoft GmbH             :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9A     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin                 :     PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 802 86 56  mobile +49 173 24 18 776  fax +49 30 80 90 57 05
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
      whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/