Python Documentation (should be better?)

[OKB (not okblacke)]

Greg Ewing wrote:

> Curiously I had the same problem just the other day,
> except with list instead of string. I think the problem
> is that the sections on the actual built-in types
> (list, str, dict, etc.) are one level too far down
> to appear in the table of contents of the Library
> Reference.
> 
> If things could be rearranged so that their names
> actually appeared in the table of contents, I think
> it would make a big difference in this area.

    	I would be satisfied if that table of contents page simply listed 
ALL the subsections, indented appropriately.  (As it is, it only lists 
them to two levels deep.)  This would also be handy in that if I knew I 
wanted to go to Mutable Sequence Types, I could click on that directly 
from the index instead of having to click through Sequence Types first.

-- 
--OKB (not okblacke)
Brendan Barnwell
"Do not follow where the path may lead.  Go, instead, where there is
no path, and leave a trail."
	--author unknown