python without OO
Peter Maas
peter at somewhere.com
Thu Jan 27 04:16:43 EST 2005
Terry Reedy schrieb:
> But if the class method syntax were
> manditory, there would be class and/or class hierarchy bloat due to the
> unlimited number of possible functions-of-a-float and large number of
> actual such functions that have been written.
You are right. I'm not an OO purist, I just wanted to convince Davor,
that anti-OO purism can be harmful too. It's good for programmers to
have a choice.
> Your Four Steps to Python Object Oriented Programming - vars, lists, dicts,
> and finally classes is great.
I'm glad you like it :)
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Maas, M+R Infosysteme, D-52070 Aachen, Tel +49-241-93878-0
E-mail 'cGV0ZXIubWFhc0BtcGx1c3IuZGU=\n'.decode('base64')
-------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Python-list
mailing list