What I don't like about wxPython

[Ryan Paul]

On Sun, 09 May 2004 11:22:42 +0000, Cameron Laird wrote:

> In article <pan.2004.05.09.01.31.27.334940 at sbcglobal.net>,
> Ryan Paul  <segphault at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> 			.
> 			.
> 			.
>>TkInter does seem a lot easier to deal with, but it doesnt provide nearly
>>as many widgets as wxPython, and in my experience, it doesnt handle
>>drawing as well. wxPython has a relatively comprehensive control set. My
> 			.
> 			.
> 			.
>>I do use Wx for programmatic drawing when PIL doesnt do quite enough.
> 			.
> 			.
> 			.
> What's the "drawing" where wxPython is handier than PIL?
> Different people use the word for different domains:  3-d
> visualization, graphing, image manipulation, ...

I used wx for a few projects. I wrote a program that allowed
graphical manipulation of makefile dependancies. It was 2d, and most
involved colored shapes with borders etc, rendering lines between shapes
intelligently, and placing text. I had to allow for components to be
moved around, and had to have certain actions performed when the user
dragged one shape on top of another, or dragged the line. I would have
just used the gnome canvas, but I needed it be windoze compatible.