Licensing of wrappers around C/C++ code under more restrictive licensing.

[Paul Rubin]

"Andrew Koenig" <ark at acm.org> writes:
> > The FSF peoples seem to have a different interpretation, as, last I
> > heard, they suggest that software that links to any GPL software, even
> > at run-time constitutes an infringement (regardless of your not having
> > distributed the GPL code yourself, and the end-user having a perfectly
> > valid license to link the two for personal use).
> 
> Can you provide evidence to support this claim?

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LinkingWithGPL