Licensing of wrappers around C/C++ code under more restrictive licensing.

[Andrew Koenig]

"Mike C. Fletcher" <mcfletch at rogers.com> wrote in message
news:mailman.1.1078031359.21439.python-list at python.org...

> The FSF peoples seem to have a different interpretation, as, last I
> heard, they suggest that software that links to any GPL software, even
> at run-time constitutes an infringement (regardless of your not having
> distributed the GPL code yourself, and the end-user having a perfectly
> valid license to link the two for personal use).

Can you provide evidence to support this claim?