[OPINION] - does language really matter if they all do the samething?
Dietrich Epp
dietrich at zdome.net
Sun Feb 15 20:31:15 EST 2004
I was wrong about that example. I thought I made that clear in a later
post. My point was that some paradigms are more Pythonic than others.
I think the only good case I made was the 'choose-random' table. I
don't generally feel constrained by Python, but Python is simply not
the right tool for every job. When I want to write a program, I first
think "How will this program work?" and then "What language most
naturally expresses this idea?"
With the 'choose-random' problem, my first idea was to write a Python
program. I could not easily express my idea in Python. I could
express my idea in Lisp, therefore, I used Lisp. I believe this
decision to be rational. In this case, I felt very constrained by
Python. My offer still stands: if anyone can express my idea in Python
(not counting future versions of Python) in a way that is approximately
as simple as how I expressed it in Lisp, I will post a picture of
myself with "Python Rulz" written on my forehead.
Someone accused me of not using Python to its full potential. I took
that as tantamount to accusing me of being a bad programmer. I had a
point, gave a good example, a bunch of bad examples, and tried to avoid
making it personal. If anyone wants to go back and show how stupid
some of my examples were, let me save you from wasting your precious
free time: THOSE EXAMPLES WERE STUPID. Now that there is NO
DISAGREEMENT, I don't see how beating this poor dead horse is going to
accomplish anything even by Usenet standards. All those posts pointing
out how stupid those examples were were all regurgitating the same
information anyway. As for the Lisp example, I have yet to see a
Python implementation that stands up to even the most trivial
inspection, so I don't expect to defend it any further. In effect, the
most productive thing that this thread can now accomplish is personal
attacks and holy wars.
In order to reduce the amount of traffic on this list, I preemptively
call anyone responding to this message either wrong or troll, so I
don't have to explicitly write that as a response.
The previous paragraph is not intended to be serious.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list