CamelCase versus wide_names (Prothon)
Peter Hansen
peter at engcorp.com
Tue Apr 20 10:22:41 EDT 2004
Lothar Scholz wrote:
> After writing a few hundert thousands lines of code in Eiffel and a
> few ten thousands lines in Java i must say that lowercase wide_names
> are much much better to read. Someone else already mentioned this
> problem:
>
> smtp_message <-> SMTPMessage <-> SmtpMessage
What about SMTP_message? If you don't deal with that issue,
you will doubtless get wide-namers who want to write it that
way instead of smtp_message.
If, on the other hand, you have a coding standard which insists
that acronyms be lower-cased, then the supposed problem you
mention above goes away, because whether you use wide_names or
mixedCase, you are consistently (not) capitalizing acronyms.
In other words, if it's a problem, it's a problem with
wide_names as well....
-Peter
More information about the Python-list
mailing list