CamelCase versus wide_names (Prothon)

[Jarek Zgoda]

Wilk <wilkSPAM at OUTflibuste.net> pisze:

>> 2) Wide_names is cleaner, more readable, compatible with C, which is the
>> standard module language for Python and Prothon.  Wide_names is also the
>> Python standard.
> 
> Before, i used CamelCase, but now i use only wide_name because i find
> that capitals letters are a pain for the finger and the wrist.  For
> example when you whant to write Q (on querty or azerty keyboard), with
> one hand you must make a gymnastic, or you will need two hands.

Underscore is such same pain. I cann't see any advantage.

-- 
Jarek Zgoda
http://jpa.berlios.de/