CamelCase versus wide_names (Prothon)

[Wilk]

Jarek Zgoda <jzgoda at gazeta.usun.pl> writes:

> Wilk <wilkSPAM at OUTflibuste.net> pisze:
>
>>> 2) Wide_names is cleaner, more readable, compatible with C, which is the
>>> standard module language for Python and Prothon.  Wide_names is also the
>>> Python standard.
>> 
>> Before, i used CamelCase, but now i use only wide_name because i find
>> that capitals letters are a pain for the finger and the wrist.  For
>> example when you whant to write Q (on querty or azerty keyboard), with
>> one hand you must make a gymnastic, or you will need two hands.
>
> Underscore is such same pain. I cann't see any advantage.

On azerty keyboard _ is under 8 and does'nt need to press shift... I
did'nt remember that it's diffent on qwerty.

-- 
Wilk - http://flibuste.net