wxPython - wx package (new style wxPython?)

[James Tanis]

        Bah, I think they are just over-glorifying the change. In my
mind, it's the same exact thing. The only real different is when you
"from wxPython.wx import *" it reads everything into your local
namespace which is traditionally considered not the best thing to do. 
I really have no idea if the "transition" when finished will remain
backwards compatible, but I'm guessing from the description of the
implementation that it is.

BTW, In the future you may want to use a real email address so that you
can receive an answer. 

On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 19:01, Logan wrote:
> Would you recommend to use the wx package of wxPython?
> 
> >From the documentation:
> 
>   Provides a way to drop the wx prefix from wxPython objects by
>   dynamically loading and renaming objects from the real wxPython
>   package.  This is the first phase of a transition to a new style
>   of using wxPython.  For example:
>                                                                                 
>       import wx
>       class MyFrame(wx.Frame):
>       ...
>                                                                                 
>   instead of:
>                                                                                 
>       from wxPython.wx import *
>       class MyFrame(wxFrame):
>       ...
> 
> What does 'this is the first phase of a transition to a new style
> using wxPython' in the above mean? Will this new style become the
> only way to use wxPython in future releases?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any answers.
> 
> -- 
> mailto: logan at phreaker(NoSpam).net