ANN: Ballot for Complementary PEP308 Ternary VOTE

[Aahz]

In article <slrnb6c040.gju.philh at cabalamat.uklinux.net>,
phil hunt <philh at cabalamat.org> wrote:
>
>I disagree. I think Condorcet is the best voting system to use for 
>this purpose. If the original vote had used it, there would be no 
>need for a second one.

And I disagree with this.  From my POV, an expanded approval vote makes
much more sense for this specific situation.  (By "expanded", I mean
that each item to be voted on can be marked as YES/NO/ABSTAIN.)

While in some sense that would be less robust than Condorcet, the
increase in simplicity and raw data would be well worth it.  But since I
abandoned running the vote in favor of dealing with PyCon, I don't get a
say.  ;-)
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

Register for PyCon now!  http://www.python.org/pycon/reg.html