ternary operator vote

[Bengt Richter]

On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 21:45:06 GMT, Andrew Koenig <ark at research.att.com> wrote:

>Bengt> IOW, I think there ought to be a direct way of expressing
>Bengt> disapproval as well as approval. With the above, there is no
>Bengt> reason not to vote on each, except to express utter
>Bengt> indifference.
>
>If "no change" is an alternative, you can express disapproval by
>voting for that alternative.
>
A: +1
B: +0
C: -0  # actual opinion, no way to express
D: -1  # ditto
no change: +1 means what?

Regards,
Bengt Richter