why not extending the syntax for classes, too ?

[Erik Max Francis]

holger krekel wrote:

> right, but we are not renaming something in a proposal (which
> doesn't exist, right) but are talking about possible ways
> to spell specifications/modifications to class and/or function
> objects aka 'def fun() is statismethod' etc.pp.
> 
> Or what am i not getting?

You're not getting the simple fact that I totally was not comprehending
the context in which you were talking about "renaming"; I thought you
were talking about something totally separate.  I understand what you
meant now, so you can ignore this email that you replied to, and check
out my other response in this thread.  Sorry about the confusion.

-- 
 Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
 __ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE
/  \ He who knows how to be poor knows everything.
\__/ Jules Michelet
    Rules for Buh / http://www.alcyone.com/max/projects/cards/buh.html
 The official rules to the betting card game, Buh.