Another conditional expression candidate (PEP 308)

[Aahz]

In article <3E48C3E2.75AC38B4 at alcyone.com>,
Erik Max Francis  <max at alcyone.com> wrote:
>"Anders J. Munch" wrote:
>>
>> The BDFL shot down the straight, parentheses not required version, in
>> the pep.  Looks too much like a statement.  Perhaps requiring
>> the parentheses that I would have used anyway will mend that.
>
>Does it?  The example shows the syntax with parentheses, but doesn't
>really make a specific point about that.  He's no fool, so I guess that
>does suggest the parentheses will be required, but it's not entirely
>clear.  (Correct me if I'm wrong; I see no mention of the parentheses
>being required.)

I've sent e-mail to Raymond Hettinger requesting clarification.
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

Register for PyCon now!  http://www.python.org/pycon/reg.html