PEP-308 a "simplicity-first" alternative

[Terry Reedy]

"Paul Rubin" <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.invalid> wrote in message
news:7xr8aenyj1.fsf at ruckus.brouhaha.com...
> I intensely dislike "x and y else z".  "Explicit is better than
> implicit" to me specifically means avoiding this type of cutesy
> overloading.

Do you intensely dislike it more or less than the current idiom "x and
y or z"?

TJR