My future Python IDE article

[Aahz]

In article <mailman.1061920192.21278.python-list at python.org>,
David Mertz <mertz at gnosis.cx> wrote:
>
>So c.l.py readers... make the case for your favorite one getting on the
>list.  I have a while to ponder the opinions advanced, should this
>prompt some discussion (it may take a little while to order review
>copies of commercial tools and/or get things installed).

I use vi, so take my advice with a grain of salt, but I think you should
include IDLE because there have been so many improvements with Python 2.3
(running code in a separate process, if nothing else), and it is the
standard IDE that comes with Python.  That would make three + IDLE for
your article, and you can get started on IDLE now.
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

This is Python.  We don't care much about theory, except where it intersects 
with useful practice.  --Aahz