python-dev Summary, 2002-11-01 through 2002-11-15
Brett C.
drifty at bigfoot.com
Mon Nov 18 00:00:32 EST 2002
==================================================
python-dev Summary, 2002-11-01 through 2002-11-15
==================================================
This is a summary of traffic on the `python-dev mailing list`_ between
November 1, 2002 and November 15, 2002 (inclusive). It is intended to
inform the wider Python community of on-going developments on the list
that might interest the wider Python community. To comment on
anything mentioned here, just post to python-list at python.org or
comp.lang.python in the usual way; give your posting a meaningful
subject line, and if it's about a PEP, include the PEP number (e.g.
Subject: PEP 201 - Lockstep iteration). All python-dev members are
interested in seeing ideas discussed by the community, so don't
hesitate to take a stance on something. And if all of this really
interests you then get involved and join python-dev!
This is the fifth summary written by Brett Cannon (after a relaxing
two week hiatus; thanks to Raymond Hettinger for doing the Summary
while I was gone).
All summaries are now archived at http://www.python.org/dev/summary/
(thanks to A.M. Kuchling for setting that up).
Please note that this summary is written using reStructuredText_ which
can be found at http://docutils.sf.net/rst.html . Any unfamiliar
punctuation is probably markup for reST_; you can safely ignore it
(although I suggest learning reST; its simple and is accepted for PEP
markup). Also, because of the wonders of programs that like to
reformat, I cannot guarantee you will be able to run the text version
of this summary through Docutils_ as-is. If you want to do that, get
an original copy of the text file.
.. _python-dev mailing list:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
.. _Docutils: http://docutils.sf.net/
.. _reST:
.. _reStructuredText: http://docutils.sf.net/rst.html
======================
Summary Announcements
======================
Not much to say for this summary. The only thread skipped that
someone out there might care about was one on getting the PEPs to
display properly for IE 6 when the PEP was written in reST_.
Thanks goes to Raymond Hettinger for covering the Summary while I was
away on vacation. Thanks also goes out to Laura Creighton and Guido
for suggesting graduate schools that are Python-friendly.
Michael Chermside was the only person to respond directly to my
question as to whether anyone had issue with me injecting my
personality into the summary. But he said to go ahead and let me
personality permeate throughout this thing, so it will. Let that be a
lesson to anyone who wanted me to shut up and be drab; had you and a
friend spoken up this little tirade would not be happening. =)
=================================
`Getting python-bz2 into 2.3`__
=================================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029830.html
Continuation of http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-October/029829.html
Gustavo Niemeyer asked how he should go about getting his python-bz2_
module into the standard library. He was basically told to submit a
patch complete with the module, docs, regression tests, etc.;
everything a healthy module needs. It was also suggested that he
provide a MSVC project file.
That didn't work for Gustavo (who now has CVS write priveleges;
congrats) since he doesn't use Windows. This was a slight problem
because if the extension file doesn't build under Windows it can't be
included in the PythonLabs Windows distro. So keep in mind that if
your module won't directly compile for 6 different versions of Windows
it won't be included in the Windows distro.
.. _python-bz2: http://python-bz2.sourceforge.net/
===================================
`Becoming a python contributor`__
===================================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029831.html
Continuation of http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-October/029828.html
Gustavo Niemeyer asked about how he could help contribute to Python.
He made the observation that "Guido and others [have been] bothered a
few times because of the lack of man power" which has led to a "small
core of very busy developers working on core/essential/hard stuff
*and* in code reviewing as well" (and I can attest to this fact that
this is very true; I am amazed the guys at PythonLabs have any form of
a life outside of work with the amount of time they put in). Gustavo
felt "that the Python development is currently overly centralized".
Martin v. Loewis responded first. He said that "the most important
aspect I'd like to hand off is the review of patches; to Tim, it is
the analysis of bug reports". Martin then listed various points on
how to be able to review a patch and how to handle bug reports; the
email is at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029831.html
. I *highly* recommend reading the email because Martin's points are
all good and more patch reviewers would be rather nice.
M.A. Lemburg commented next, saying that he "wouldn't mind if other
developers with some time at hand jump in on already assigned patches
and bug reports to help out". Just because a patch has been assigned
to someone doesn't mean the patch or the assignee couldn't use more
help. Having the patch assigned to someone just means that they take
responsibility to apply the patch if it is worthy of being accepted or
to reject it. It should not stop other people from making comments or
helping out so that the assignee can have a little bit of time saved
for other things... like another patch to assign to themselves. MAL
also suggested that we have more maintainers that are in charge of
chunks of code, e.g. Martin handles all locale code.
Martin disagreed with this idea, though. Jack Jansen agreed with
Martin. He thought that if something came up that was not within the
realm of a specific person that it "either get[s] ignored, or passed
on to Guido, or picked up by yourself or Michael [Hudson] or one of
the very few other people who do general firefighting". Martin
commented later that he would hope that the stewardship of specific
code does not get any more formal.
Martin then stated how one goes about getting commit priveleges for
Python on SF: "just step forward and say that you want. In the past,
Guido has set a policy that people who's commit privilege is fresh
will still have to use SF, but can perform the checkin themselves".
Tradition has stated that "fresh" is your first two or three SF
patches. But please only step forward if you are known to python-dev
or PythonLabs since commit priveleges won't be given to people who
just wander in off the proverbial street and ask for it. Martin
basically states this in a later email by saying that "people should
not produce a burst of patches just to get commit privileges. Instead,
they should contribute patches steadily (and should have done so in
the past), and then get CVS write access as a simplification for the
rest of the maintainers".
Neal Norwitz pointed out that if a bug ends up with a fix it is best
to submit a separate patch instead of attaching it to the bug report.
That way there is a bigger chance of the patch being seen and dealth
with. But please make sure to mention that it fixes a bug so that the
bug can be closed! Martin even suggested mentioning this fact in the
title of the patch submission.
====================
`RoundUp status`__
====================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029879.html
This is a splinter thread of the 'Becoming a python contributor'
thread in which Micheal Hudson asked how using Roundup_ for replacing
SF_ was coming along. Guido said things had come up that was holding
it up. One was that the test server running at
http://www.python.org:8080 had died when the box was restarted (it is
now back up). There were also some changes to Roundup that needed to
be dealt with in order to get everything over from SF on to Roundup.
Guido also just ran out of time to review it more, although he did
like what he had reviewed so far. Guido asked for a volunteer.
It was asked what was needed. Guido said that Roundup had moved over
to Zope-style templating so all the old templates that Gordon (I
assuming this is Gordon McMillan) wrote needed to be changed. There
were also some bugs that needed to be dealt with that are being
tracked at Roundup hosted at http://www.python.org:8080 . And there
also will need to be preparations for the day that development is
moved over from SF to the Roundup setup; that will require
transferring everything over from SF, shutting down SF, and handling
any bugs that crop up from the heavy use that the new setup is going
to get.
So if you have any dislike for SF, then please contribute to Roundup
and help get Python off of there!
.. _Roundup: http://roundup.sourceforge.net/
.. _SF: http://www.sf.net/
=======================================
`Contributing...current bug status`__
=======================================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029846.html
Neal Norwitz went through the SF_ bug tracker and counted 325 bugs and
generated a very easy to read page listing all the bugs with their
relevant info. You can find the HTML version at
http://www.metaslash.com/py/sf.data.html . If you find a bug there
you think you can help out on, then go to SF and do so!
=======================
`Low hanging fruit`__
=======================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029850.html
Neal Norwitz generated a list of what he thought were easily fixable
bugs and put them in this thread (it's the first email so just go to
the link for this thread). So if you have a little bit of free time
and want to help out why don't you try to tackle one of these bugs?
===============
`Snake farm`__
===============
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029853.html
The only reason I am mentioning this thread here is to help get the
word out about the `Snake Farm`_ ; hosted by Lysator_ and sponsored by
the `Python Business Forum`_ . It is a compile farm that downloads
from CVS, compiles, and runs the test suite of Python daily. It has
caught a bunch of bugs and has been a great help.
The majority of the thread was spent trying to get FreeBSD 4.4 to
compile Python and trying to work out a possible bug in pymalloc.
.. _Snake Farm: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~sfarmer/
.. _Lysator: http://www.lysator.liu.se/
.. _Python Business Forum: http://www.python-in-business.org
====================================
`David Goodger joins PEP editor`__
====================================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029866.html
David Goodger has somehow gotten suckered into becoming a PEP editor
(I suspect Barry Warsaw had something to do with this since he used to
do all of the PEP editing). So you can all welcome David to his new
responsibility by flooding him with all of those PEPs you have lying
around and were not sure were good enough to submit. =)
========================
`metaclass insanity`__
========================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029872.html
Continuation of http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-October/029795.html
Michael Hudson posted the question as to how to get writing
``__bases__`` for new-style classes to do the "right thing" since the
mro does not seem to be updated. Kevin Jacob gave it a go but ran
into a bug.
Guido said that currently there is no way to touch the MRO from Python
code. All of that info is stored in the tp_mro slot in the object's C
representation and is stored as a tuple whose members are expected to
be either types or classic classes. Guido said he would accept a
patch for assigning to the mro if a check was included to make sure
the previously mentioned constraint was maintained. He also said he
would probably accept a patch that allowed for assignable
``__bases__`` and writing ``__name__`` .
Michael Hudson commented about the difficulty of all of these patches.
One thing that came up was the connection between ``__bases__`` and
``__base__`` and how assignment to ``__base__`` should not be taken
lightly; Guido commented that "the old and new base must be layout
compatible, exactly like for assignment to __class__".
Guido later pointed out that ``__base__`` becomes the built-in type
that you derive from; whether it be object, list, dict, etc. It was
agreed that ``__base__`` shouldn't be writable.
The point was made that nestable classes are not picklable since only
thing at the top level of a module can be pickled. Guido said he
considered this a flaw although he couldn't think of why someone would
want to embed a class within a class or a function. This spawned
comments on how to deal with this. It seemed the best solution was to
change ``__name__`` for the inner class to a fully dotted name (e.g.
``X.Y.__name__ = "X.Y"``) and then make a simple change to either
``pickle`` or ``getattr()``. It was eventually agreed upon that
setting ``__name__`` to the full dotted name of the class was the best
solution and it was filed as `bug #633930`_ .
As part of trying to give Guido good examples of why nested classes
are good (the best attempt was Walter Dorwald in an email at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029906.html
that elicited a "that's cool" comment from Guido), the idea of having
``__iter__`` contain a class definition that returned an instance of
that class came up. That was shot down because of the performance hit
of dealing with the class definition on every call to ``__iter__``.
But the idea of defining ``__iter__`` as a generator was pointed out
by Just van Rossum. Doing that simplifies the code usually a good
amount since the generator handles all ``.next()`` calls and you just
need to have the generator stop when you want your iterator to stop.
Apparently this is not a widely used idiom, so I am mentioning it here
since it is a great idea that I can personally attest to as being a
rather nice way to handle iterators.
.. _bug #633930: http://www.python.org/sf/633930
============================
`[#527371] sre bug/patch`__
============================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029936.html
I am mentioning this thread not because the bug is that big of a deal,
but because of the PEP that was brought up when dealing with the bug;
`PEP 291`_ . This informational PEP, among other things, lists
modules that must be kept compatible with certain versions of Python;
in this case sre has to be kept compatible with Python 1.5.2. Except
for sre, they are all packages that have made their way into the
library. You might want to have a look at the list if you are hacking
on any packages in the stdlib.
.. _PEP 291: http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0291.html
======================================================================
`Re: [snake-farm] test test_slice failed -- [9, 7, 5, 3, 1] == [0]`__
======================================================================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029941.html
Once again this is not to meant to mention directly what as discussed
in the thread but a point made. The bug that was discovered was an
issue with 64-bit machines and the 32-bit limitation of lists and
slicing. The 32-bit limit currently is hard-coded into the C code.
Obviously some people would like to see this changed.
Neal Norwitz laid down a rough outline on how one could go about
changing this at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029953.html
. Guido then made a pronouncement later stating that he is willing to
break binary compatibility once for Python 2.3 or 2.4 to get this
done. He also mentioned some other things to make sure to do.
As of this writing no one has stepped forward to take this on.
==============================
`Reindenting unicodedata.c`__
==============================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029997.html
While doing some work on `Modules/unicodedata.c`_ , Martin v. Loewis
noticed that the indentation style didn't follow `PEP 7`_ and he
wondered if it would be okay to re-indent the file. This brought up
two points.
One was that PEP 7 was not stringently followed. The PEP says to "Use
single-tab indents, where a tab is worth 8 spaces". Now that goes
against Python coding style where you are supposed to use 4-space
indents. So the question of whether one should still use the tab
style in new C code came up. Guido said he wished new C code would,
but for files he doesn't touch very often he doesn't feel he can
enforce it. Barry and Martin came up with an Emacs "local variables"
stanza for the bottom of any file that uses a non-PEP style which can
be found at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030067.html
. But following the PEP is still the "officially" supported style.
But you should try to follow PEP 7 for all new C code and PEP 8 for
Python code.
The other point was when to re-indent. It was agreed upon to only do
that when a major change in the code was occuring. And when you do
re-indent, do it as a separate check-in for CVS.
.. _Modules/unicodedata.c:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/python/python/dist/src/Modules/unicodedata.c
.. _PEP 7: http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0007.html
=============================
`Printing and __unicode__`__
=============================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030098.html
Martin v. Loewis brought up a point made by Henry Thompson on c.l.py
asking why printing ignores ``__unicode__``. Martin thought it
shouldn't and listed a bunch of options on how to make printing work
with ``__unicode__``. The winner was to have "A file indicates
"unicode-awareness" somehow. For a Unicode-aware file, it tries
``__unicode__``, ``__str__``, and ``__repr__``, in order". The agreed
solution was to add an ``.encoding`` attribute. This attribute can be
set to None when the stream is in Unicode and never converts to a
byte-stream.
But then M.A. Lemburg chimed in. He was fine with the addition of the
``.encoding``; "this attribute is already available on stream objects
created with codecs.open()". What he didn't like was having
``.encoding`` set to None mean the stream would accept Unicode.
Martin asked then if ``StringIO`` should have ``.encoding``.
MAL replied that "``StringIO`` should be considered a non-Unicode
aware stream, so it should not implement .encoding". He thought that
if someone wanted ``StringIO`` to be Unicode-aware they could use "the
tools in codecs.py [since they] can be used for this (basically by
doing the same kind of wrapping as ``codecs.open()`` does)". But then
Martin pointed out that StringIO is already Unicode-aware.
This debate continued between MAL, Martin, and Guido. But then Guido
just said he gave up since the current behavior was relied upon too
much.
===================
`Adopting Optik`__
===================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030108.html
Splinter threads:
- `Re: [getopt-sig] Adopting Optik
<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030154.html>`__
- `Re: Adopting Optik
<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030189.html>`__
- `Fw: [Python-Dev] Adopting Optik
<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030165.html>`__
- `[getopt-sig] Re: [Python-Dev] Adopting Optik
<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030179.html>`__
Guido sent an email saying that he would like to get Python 2.3a out
the door by X-mas. This means trying to come up with a new name for
Optik_ , Greg Ward's command-line options parser. The complaint about
the current name is that it's too cute. Guido started it by
suggesting the name ``options``.
Peter Funk brought up two things. One was that Docutils already used
the module under its Optik name. To this Guido responded that they
could just change the name in the code. Peter also said that Greg
liked ``OptionsParser``. There was also the point that module names
are preferred to be short and lowercase.
Ka-Ping Yee and myself brought up the point that ``options`` is very
generic. Guido agreed with this point while also mentioning that many
people already have their own modules named options.py. He then
suggested ``optlib`` since "It's short, un-cute, and follows the \*lib
pattern used all over the Python stdlib". Greg Ward liked this
suggestion.
I personally suggested ``ArgParser``, trying to get a tie-in for
sys.argv. Greg Ewing built off of this and suggested ``argvparse``,
similar to ``urlparse``. David Ascher preferred ``argparse`` since
"The v is archaic and so silent it fades away =)". David Abrahams
disagreed, stating how the "v" deals with any ambiguity. David
Abrahams also said he would vote for ``argvparse`` to break a tie.
Ka-Ping Yee suggested ``cmdline`` and ``cmdopts``. David Abrahams
liked both.
Steve Holden built off of Guido's ``optlib`` and pushed for
``optionlib``.
Raymond Hettinger threw ``OptionParser`` into the ring.
But then Guido asked for a call to votes between ``optlib`` and
``argvparse``. I tallied the votes at one point with it kind of split
between them. Then Guido announced that ``optparse`` won (and no,
that is not a typo).
.. _Optik: http://optik.sf.net/
===========================
`Killing off bdist_dumb`__
===========================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030139.html
Splinter threads:
- `RE: [Distutils] Killing off bdist_dumb
<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030153.html>`__
- `E: [Distutils] Killing off bdist_dumb
<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030219.html>`__
A.M. Kuchling asked if anyone would mind if bdist_dumb was removed
from distutils (the conversation also happened with `distutils-sig`_
). Apparently it is rather broken in terms of the paths of the files
because it makes them all relative. M.A. Lemburg, though, spoke up
stating that he uses bdist_dumb. It still wasn't fully resolved as of
this writing.
The point of being able to build bdist_wininst on non-Windows
platforms came up during this discussion as well. It was decided to
move the binary files needed for bdist_wininst into CVS (now filed as
`bug #638595`_ ).
.. _distutils-sig: http://www.python.org/sigs/distutils-sig/
.. _bug #638595: http://www.python.org/sf/638595
===============================================
`Python interface to attribute descriptors`__
===============================================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030118.html
Splinter threads:
- `Python interface to attribute descriptors
<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030213.html>`__
Paul Dubois decided to cause himself some grief and attempt to
comprehend the miracle that is descriptors (more info can be found in
the `2.2.2 What's New`_ doc and in `PEP 252`_). He was wondering if
there was more documentation than the signatures of the functions for
the C API. He also wanted to know if there was a way to play with
them in the Python world since all of his attempts fell short of them
being "first-class citizen from Python".
Guido admitted that the docs were lacking. He then asked for some
help in writing the docs. He responded to Paul's second question by
saying that he thought it should work as long as you avoided classic
classes.
Thanks to Guido saying that is should work, Paul realized that he
misread the PEP. To be nice he emailed out an example of how a
descriptor could know where it came from at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030141.html
. Phillip Ebey also chimed in on how to write a metaclass that said
the name of the descriptor at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030213.html
.
.. _2.2.2 What's New:
http://www.python.org/doc/2.2.2/whatsnew/sect-rellinks.html#SECTION000320000000000000000
.. _PEP 252: http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0252.html
==============================
`IDLE local scope cleanup`__
==============================
__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030124.html
Patrick O'Brien (author of PyCrust_ ) wondered how IDLE managed to
keep its local scope so clean once it finished launching. Guido said
that IDLE (or at least the GRPC version which Patrick O'Brien believes
stands for Generalized Remote Procedure Call) runs the shell in a
subprocess that is careful not to pollute the namespace.
Patrick thanked Guido and then presented his real question: how to
handle not polluting the namespace with a way getting around a
pickling issue. He "used to just pass a regular dictionary to
code.InteractiveInterpreter, which worked well enough", but there was
an issue with pickling. So then he tried passing
``sys.modules['__main__'].__dict__``, which worked but cluttered the
namespace.
Guido's response: "Remove the clutter". Guido said that this would
most likely require a minimalistic main program that bootstrapped
using ``__import__('run').main()`` which would run the code without
adding to the namespace.
.. _PyCrust: http://www.orbtech.com/wiki/PyCrust
More information about the Python-list
mailing list