Stackless Platform Independence?
Christian Tismer
tismer at tismer.com
Tue Mar 5 04:26:30 EST 2002
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Christian Tismer <tismer at tismer.com> writes:
>
>>Makes pretty much sense to me.
>>Stackless can provide light-weight threads to all platforms.
>>There is no need to use OS threads unless you need it
>>for I/O.
>>
>
> Do you think it's feasible to modify Python to use non-blocking i/o
> everywhere, and then simulate blocking in Stackless? I.e. when a
> microthread does an i/o operation, Python would start the operation
> asynchronously, and the Stackless microthread scheduler would block
> the microthread til the i/o operation actually completes (detected
> using select or SIGIO).
This is roughly how I understood Frederic's idea.
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaunstr. 26 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14163 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
where do you want to jump today? http://www.stackless.com/
More information about the Python-list
mailing list