Status of PEP's?

[Courageous]

>Now which is easier to come up with?

for i in [9:3]:

... with the provision that the negative stride is
inferable and therefor assumed. This has been rejected
already so I hear. But it still seems perfectly clear
to me. I guess I'll have to go hunt down the PEP and
see what the rejection rationale was...

At least we dont have for (exp-list;expr-listl;expr-list):

That's nasty, imo.

C//