j2ee vs. python (and what our evil competitors are saying about python)
Bo M. Maryniuck
b.maryniuk at forbis.lt
Tue Jul 9 04:41:07 EDT 2002
You know, that's funny. :))))))
On Tuesday 09 July 2002 01:18, curt finch wrote:
> Issues and concerns
> · No integrated GUI (Graphic user interface) support.
wxWindows, anygui, Tk, GTK+, QT, fwm and Windoze resources. Did somebody can
make Java soft with... QT or wxWindows widgets? No?!..
> · No compiler to the native code.
Aha, sure. Java -- "write once and debug everywhere". Ask them what is JVM and
what that 40 megs bloatware doing on your machine and why same Java crapware
doe not working on shortly-different JVM versions.
> · No automatic garbage collection.
What?!
> · Does not have vast number of libraries as that of Java,
> Perl, C++; etc.
Actually, do not trust for all what is on CPAN, if you do something expencive,
commertial and with long support offering. IMHO...
> · Since Python is an interpreted language, it requires
> frequent run-time checks and thus does not provide the speed,
> performance and efficiency of compiled languages like Java, Perl and
> C++, which is a major issue.
This is really VERY funny. Who said that *Perl* or Java is compiled language?
They both are _interpreters_ with different that Java do bytecode first.
> · Python does not provide multiple ways to perform tasks as do
> most other languages.
This is just commertial crap of stupid managers.
> · Limited documentation- only two English language books exist
> which provide tutorials or a library reference for Python.
Take them look over amazon.com -- let they stop crapping you.
> · The language is restricted to fewer code modules.
Ask them to show the Java code, where is the multiple class inheritance. ;-)
> · Lacks native threading capabilities.
Really? Just do:
import thread
import threading
...or show them few examples of threading from wxWindows demos.
> · Lacks basic tools such as integrated source level debuggers.
Oh yes. I "like" when JSP shows me at leat five pages of traceback where you
can found nothing suitable for bugfixing. One of the all featureas why I like
Python -- is _exact_ and _smart_ explanation what and where is wrong (unlike
Perl or Java).
> · No packaging methods for software distribution.
Look at any release since 2.0 (afaik).
> · Lacks tools to solve typographical and type mismatch classes
> of errors.
What the crap is here? Is it like "wwooohhoooo!!! I have COMPILED it!!!
SEL-L-L!!!"
> · Python cannot write docstrings in C++.
What is this (anybody understood this?).
> · Python is difficult to read.
Aha, sure:
-----------------8<-----------------
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
$_=q[";7w2q";m/656/bq6/i;$g=
q(3616w8206qc7);$/="265502";
0;{$w=~y/726568q7/=46/;}for(
6..ew(6));q1;=|20.747.3754|;
@wa];s[\[^0-9a-f\]]{}g;@ARGV
=reverse(/../g);$a=\@ARGV;0;
grep{push(@_,sprintf('%.2x',
hex))}@$a;$"=q s\xs ;$$=qq"$
\"@_";$$=~s/\s//g;print eval
qq("$$");
-----------------8<-----------------
> Application Areas
> · Prototyping and development
> · Platform independent graphic user interface applications
> · Internet scripting/applications
> · Automated test harnesses
> · System administration applications
> · Shell scripting/OS Scripting
> · Text processing
> · Database Interfaces
> · Application Extensions
> · Distributed Programming
All of this are just buzzwords, used by stupid lamers. What I suggest, is only
FIRE OUT your competitors.
> Python users
> · Yahoo
> · Infoseek
also NASA, Google, IBM and a lot of others, described on http://www.python.org
--
Sincerely yours, Bogdan M. Maryniuck
lp1 on fire
(One of the more obfuscated kernel messages)
More information about the Python-list
mailing list