Python.NET, MONO and Visual Studio etc.
David Bolen
db3l at fitlinxx.com
Thu Nov 1 19:02:00 EST 2001
Max <maxx at easynews.com> writes:
> Thus, my point is that if a Python.NET is made available before the
> demand exists, then it can take advantage of forces already existing
> that do not have a current option.
Except that my interpretation is that creating a complete (e.g. not
the basic pilot/prototype that ActiveState) production Python.NET that
- and this is the key - performed well is not trivial. I'm sure it
can be done, but it's going to take some real work and resource, which
for an average commercial company would likely have a pre-requisite of
demand.
Reading the white paper on the ActiveState site for Python.NET is
interesting, and shows how the CLR and VM for .NET, while powerful, is
not necessarily a good fit for dynamic scripting languages. There's
no equivalent paper for Perl.NET but I expect that many of the issues
were the same.
--
-- David
--
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------\
\ David Bolen \ E-mail: db3l at fitlinxx.com /
| FitLinxx, Inc. \ Phone: (203) 708-5192 |
/ 860 Canal Street, Stamford, CT 06902 \ Fax: (203) 316-5150 \
\-----------------------------------------------------------------------/
More information about the Python-list
mailing list