Suggestion for a change to a standard module - where?

[Fernando Pérez]

Fernando Pérez wrote:

I guess I should clarify:

> that arise in the standard module code.
                                    ^^^^ -> 'code.py'

> Code which uses the module in its standard form needs no changes
  ^^^^ -> normal use of the word 'code'.

The confusion is b/c there's a standard module actually called 
'code'. Real descriptive, eh? Especially when you look into it and 
realize what it implements is the interactive interpreter itself 
(which you can use to build your own interpreters).

Oh well, somebody was having a low name-creativity day when they put 
that out.

Cheers,

f.